My Background

I am a freelancer and entrepreneur who is task-oriented, pay attention to details and a team-worker. I'm also an avid investor in small ideas, keen reader and social activist who is enthusiastic in finding new opportunities by combining creative and analytical skills. I'm also a strategist who is systematic in approaching challenges. I grew up around farming communities, urban townships, mining towns and city metropolis within the various provinces in South Africa. This exposure lead me to be interested in human interaction and to appreciate what the human mind is capable of achieving. Through my vast interaction with different people, I managed to increasing my personal network. It became clear at an early stage of my life with the ability to spot opportunities which made me by nature, to become a social enterprenuer.....

Social Entrepreneur:
  1. defined as a person who establishes an enterprise with the aim of solving social problems or effecting social change.

As an individual with a positive outlook towards my challenges, I've embarked on the most interesting journeys in my life which I intend on documenting. These are the glimpse of my trials and tribulations because I believe that: "You must believe you are the best and then make sure that you are...".. I was once told that: "If you don't have enough money then you haven't helped enough people yet". The road to riches is paved with acquisition of specific knowledge.

Favorite Quote:

“A wonderful fact to reflect upon, that every human creature is constituted to be that profound secret and mystery to every other.”
― Charles Dickens, A Tale of Two Cities

My Work Experience:
Technician | Draughtsman | Planner

Previous Position(s)

Executive Director | Dihlakanyane Trading (Pty) Ltd. t/a Instructor Labs
Tshwane, South Africa | February 2012 - April 2016
Director of Operations | Dithokeng Cleaning Services cc
Tshwane, South Africa | August 2006 - December 2007
Managing Director | Keyamo Management Solutions (Pty) Ltd. t/a Keyamo Technologies
Johannesburg, South Africa | April 2003 - November 2016
Design Draughtsman | Mamphake Office Supplies cc t/a Mamphake Designs
Rayton, South Africa | July 1999 - February 2017

Current Position(s)

Planning Consultant | Mamphake Mabule Inc. t/a Documan Consulting
Rayton, South Africa | 2012 - present

Freelancer & Entreprenuer
My Education and Skill(s):
  • Management:
  • I am an Enterpreneur with Financial, Production and Marketing management skills operating within the building and construction environment using BIM, Microsoft Office & Project, ACCPAC & Pastel (SAGE) Accounting softwares, Open Workbench including working on Building automation systems. I studied BCom:Management; and a Programme in Financial Management at UNISA - I evaluate and prepare bids and specifications while assisting clients in the approval processes. I also prepare reports including project costing/estimates and statistical calculations. I also supervise and monitor production in-house and on-site while training personnel in the use and correct installation of products. I plan and allocate work using work orders and production schedules. I market products, liaise with customer while developing new and improving existing range of products and services.
  • Technical:
  • I am a Freelancer with Architectural, Mechanical, Electrical and Piping draughting skills operating within the building and construction industry using AutoCAD, SketchUp Pro, CoralDraw, SQL Database Design including software programming in GCode, HTML, Visual Basic, Python, and Javascript. I studied course(s) in Architectural Draughting and AutoCAD at Inscape College; Mechanical Drawing and Design at Tshwane South TVET College; and NDip:Electrical Engineering at Tshwane University of Technology. I prepare and present project drawings and construction documentation, including producing and interpreting CAD/CAM detailed drawings according to SANS 10400, SABS 0432, SABS 044, SABS 0144, BS 1553, BS 1635 and BS 3939, SANS 204 and SABS 048. I also fabricate, install, test/repair/modify and maintain electrical and mechanical systems according to SANS 10142, SANS 10198, SANS 10292, SANS 10108, SANS 60079, SANS 61241, SANS 10123 and including the Occupational Health and Safety Act.
  • My passion is finding sustainable and cost-saving solutions while being energy efficient.......

Saturday, November 7, 2015

Cognitive Evolution

As a social entrepreneur, I have asked myself time and time again whether I've become one dimensional when coming to my understanding of the use of social networks? This is a serious topic to me because of the fact that most of us (especially especially) are invested in relationships without going into details of the workings of these relationships. I know that positive attitudes toward a new communication technology tend to be a significant motivator in subsequent adoption and use. The recent spurt in the adoption of social media tools such as social networking sites (SNSs) demands the examination of attitudinal variables on motives to use these instruments.

I once read about a study which explicated a multidimensional measure of attitudes toward SNSs and tested a theoretical model to examine the effect of attitudes on motives to use SNSs and SNS activity. Participants (N=674) completed a cross-sectional survey consisting of measures of attitudes toward SNSs, motives of SNS use, and level of activity. Results showed support for a revised model in which attitudinal variables-ease of use, self-disclosure, and social connection-strongly predicted motives of SNS use such as passing time, information/entertainment, social conformity, and, most importantly, socialization.

As a social entrepreneurs, I too have taken note of the motive of using SNSs as a social tool that supersedes the direct effect of other motives on SNS activity, suggesting that users' primary activity on SNSs was for socialization and for relational development and maintenance. Again I ask, Are social entrepreneurs broadening this platform by developing various uses that is multidimensional? First of all, the understanding of human cognitive evolution, and that of the other primates, means taking sociality very seriously. For humans, this requires the recognition of the sociocultural and historical means by which human minds and selves are constructed, and how this gives rise to the reflexivity and ability to respond to novelty that characterize our species.

For other, non-linguistic, primates we can answer some interesting questions by viewing social life as a feedback process, drawing on cybernetics and systems approaches and using social network neo-theory to test these ideas. Specifically, we need to show how social networks can be formalized as multi-dimensional objects, and use entropy measures to assess how networks respond to perturbation. We also need to refer to the use of simulations and natural ‘knock-outs’ in a free-ranging baboon troop to demonstrate that changes in interactions after social perturbations lead to a more certain social network, in which the outcomes of interactions are easier for members to predict. 

Without sounding like an academic sort: I also read an article that supports Mead's theory that further explains how the communicative process by which a human mind comes into being has two phases. The first phase, which Mead calls the ‘conversation of gestures’, characterizes the communicative interactions of non-human animals. Mead's argument was that non-humans undoubtedly communicate with each other, but that they have no sense they are doing so. One animal produces some action or gesture that is responded to by the other, which then elicits a further response from the first in a very ‘conversational’ way. Neither animal, however, needs to understand that its own gestures are causing the other animal to act. They ‘know how’ to communicate but they do not ‘know that’ they are doing so. Animals that engage each other in this way cannot respond to their own gestures from the standpoint of others; in this sense, their communication is ‘unconscious’ (or perhaps ‘non-conscious’). 

The second phase that emerges—both evolutionarily and developmentally—is the ‘conversation of significant gestures’: a form of conscious communication, via language (significant symbols), that arises out of the process of unconscious communication. Once communication via significant symbols is possible, it gives rise to the capacity to respond actively to our own gestures from the standpoint of others. For example, Mead suggests that, when we ask someone to fetch us a chair, the vocal gesture we make ‘calls out’ in us the same response that it calls out in the person to whom it was directed. For Mead, it is this capacity to turn our vocal gestures back on ourselves—this reflexivity—that characterizes the emergence of thought, and our ability to communicate intentionally and not just ‘unconsciously’.

The mind is, in other words, a form of social participation: a process, not a thing. This is important for me to note, however, that Mead was not denying a central role for the evolved nature of the human brain, nor was he suggesting that all human cognition was produced by cultural processes alone. Instead, the process is one of mutual enhancement and integration: the nature of the human brain is instrumental in the process of creating minds—thus we should not expect to find that, with appropriate social and cultural scaffolding. The sociocultural foundations of human cognition are thus laid clear by this framework: mind is an active process by which we set out to make sense of our particular social environment and is itself changed as a result of that interaction through feedback processes designed to control our perceptions of ourselves and of others.
In conclusion, I've learned that our social dimensions have a common set of nodes, typically, corresponding to human beings Layers, in turn, reflect various relation types coming from different user activities gathered in computer systems. The time dimension corresponds to temporal variability of the social network. Social groups for example, are extracted by means of clustering methods and join people close each other. An atom component of the multidimensional social network are views – small social sub-networks, which are in the intersection of all dimensions. A view describes the state of one social group, linked by only one type of relationships (one layer), derived from within only one time period. A true multidimensional model of the social network is similar to the general concept of data warehouses, in which a fact corresponds to a view.
This new formalization of social networks provides me with a framework within which to predict network dynamics and evolution, which is most likely going to help me highlight how social networks work when developing my business relationships and has implications for my future investment decisions when coming to cognitive evolution......

No comments:

Post a Comment

My Profile